Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX
