Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 215g / 7,58oz and a ergonomics of 6.28 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X
