Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Delphin INKS 3000X

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Delphin INKS 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Delphin INKS?
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Delphin INKS 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX
