Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
57.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/215
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX edges out Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). Still, Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5+1 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Delphin MonoDRAG?
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
