Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
92.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €396.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and weight (260g / 9,17oz). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX
