Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
92.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €396.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X
