Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
92.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €396.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.53 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
