Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Shimano Twin Power FE, 4000MFE, left and right hand, Stationary fishing reel, Front Drag, TP4000MFE
Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
92.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings9+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €396.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000MFE
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120
Daiwa 22 Exist LT, 4000D, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10102-401
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €655.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000D
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX offers a line retrieve per crank of 87 centimeter / 34.25 inch, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

  • Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.