Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
92.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €396.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (9.22 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X
