Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (9.44 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R
