Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (9.44 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Delphin INKS 4000X
