Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Shimano Twin Power FE

Spinning

94.40 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.57 out of 10

Ergonomics6.13 out of 10

Gear ratio5.7:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight260g / 9.17oz

Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch

Ball bearings9+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €399.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000MHGFE
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

89.70 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.58 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €175.50
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX offers a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.