Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.7:1) and weight (260g / 9,17oz). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X
