Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX clearly outshines Penn Battle III 8000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) and weight (260g / 9,17oz). While Penn Battle III 8000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Penn Battle III?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X
