Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (9.44 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
