Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (9.44 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
