Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and durability (5.57 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX
