Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €180.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (6.2:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX
