Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Delphin FRIZ vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
