Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs and a durability of 5.57 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX
