Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X clearly outshines Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
