Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
