Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
