Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight159g / 5.61oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €85.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R
