Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Delphin INKS 3000X

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX edges out Delphin INKS 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). Still, Delphin INKS 3000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Delphin INKS?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Delphin INKS 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
