Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
58.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/210
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX and Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX offers a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs, while Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X stands out for a ball bearings of 5+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Delphin MonoDRAG?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC
