Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX and Penn Battle III 8000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX offers a weight of 265g / 9,35oz, while Penn Battle III 8000 HSX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Penn Battle III?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X
