Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Sedona FJ 500
Spinning
500x
60.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX and Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX offers a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs, while Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Sedona FJ 500?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
