Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1/2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight980g / 34.57oz
Line retireve per crank118 centimeter / 46.46 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €264.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 30/470
Conclusion
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1/2.3:1) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 265g / 9,35oz and a line retrieve per crank of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX
- Higher gear ratio of 5.2:1/2.3:1 (scoring 9.4 out of 10), provides more speed meaning a better solution when quick retrieves really count
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX
