Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX
