Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (6.64 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Sahara 2500 R?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX
