Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX edges out Shimano Sedona 500 FI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the durability (5.57 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona 500 FI holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing and a gear ratio of 5.6:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Sedona 500 FI?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
