Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX edges out Shimano Sedona 500 FI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the durability (5.57 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona 500 FI holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing and a gear ratio of 5.6:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Sedona 500 FI?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX
