Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Shimano Twin Power FE

Spinning

66.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.57 out of 10

Ergonomics6.12 out of 10

Gear ratio4.4:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight265g / 9.35oz

Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch

Ball bearings9+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €399.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000PGFE
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Spinning

68.90 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000 HG
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140

Conclusion

Both Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX offers a durability of 5.57 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI?

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues