Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
