Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
