Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
