Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.53 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
