Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Shimano Twin Power FE

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.57 out of 10

Ergonomics6.13 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight260g / 9.17oz

Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch

Ball bearings9+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €399.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000XGFE
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.58 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €175.50
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-CXH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX offers a line retrieve per crank of 101 centimeter / 39.76 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.