Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and weight (260g / 9,17oz). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
