Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
