Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX
