Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX
Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X