Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX
