Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Delphin INKS 4000X

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/470
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch). While Delphin INKS 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Delphin INKS?
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin INKS 4000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
