Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX offers a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC
