Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX offers a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
