Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC
