Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX edges out Daiwa TD FEEDER QD with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the weight (245g / 8,64oz). Still, Daiwa TD FEEDER QD holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 4.9:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Daiwa TD FEEDER QD?
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
