Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX and Shimano AERO XR 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR 4000X stands out for a ball bearings of 5+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
