Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX edges out Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the weight (245g / 8,64oz). Still, Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.8:1 and a ball bearings of 3+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power XD A and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X
